Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System

Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System
Author :
Publisher : MICHIE
Total Pages : 296
Release :
ISBN-10 : STANFORD:36105036235542
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (42 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System by : Monroe H. Freedman

Download or read book Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System written by Monroe H. Freedman and published by MICHIE. This book was released on 1975 with total page 296 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System Related Books

Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System
Language: en
Pages: 296
Authors: Monroe H. Freedman
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 1975 - Publisher: MICHIE

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A Modern Legal Ethics
Language: en
Pages: 374
Authors: Daniel Markovits
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-12-28 - Publisher: Princeton University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A Modern Legal Ethics proposes a wholesale renovation of legal ethics, one that contributes to ethical thought generally. Daniel Markovits reinterprets the posi
Model Rules of Professional Conduct
Language: en
Pages: 216
Authors: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2007 - Publisher: American Bar Association

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions lo
Lawyers and Justice
Language: en
Pages: 471
Authors: David Luban
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-06-05 - Publisher: Princeton University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The law, Holmes said, is no brooding omnipresence in the sky. "If that is true," writes David Luban, "it is because we encounter the legal system in the form of
THE PRACTICE OF JUSTICE
Language: en
Pages: 265
Authors: William H. Simon
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher: Harvard University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

William Simon, a legal theorist with experience in practice, here argues that the profession's standard approach to questions of legal ethics is incoherent and